
There’s only two days left of the Bush Administration, and two more posts left to complete
my list of 100 Reasons I will celebrate Tuesday’s Inauguration – a project that began almost 100 days ago. As we get close to the Top 10, it seems all of today’s list could have made it. And, in some instances, so could most of Reasons 100-21. Some of this installment of the list deal with broader themes, rather than individual moments of idiocy. I will post the Top 10 on Monday – Bush’s final day in Washington, D.C. You know, I just don’t think we’ll see him going back there much.
#20.
Bush the Economist: I don’t think I need to spend a great deal of time pointing out the obvious. On January 20, 2001 Bill Clinton handed W. $128 Billion (with a B) extra dollars the country had saved up. Bush would have us believe that the reason he never posted a surplus in his eight years, and the reason we are facing the largest deficit ever, is because 19 terrorists flew jets into the World Trade Center. But history has already judged him on this one.
The attacks of 9/11 did not cost $128B, nor did they immediately shut down the nation’s ability to generate income and reduce spending. The Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost a lot (especially because we paid extra for
Cheney’s buddies to get paid, and that $9 billion Paul Bremer lost didn’t help), but did not cripple the economy. Three major factors will be forever embarrassing to his Harvard business professors: First,
Bush never seemed to care about jobs, until he could brag about “surprising” growth in his second term. Jobs would have built the economy, and maybe a tower… or two; Second, the blind eye turned to the ridiculous mortgage boom by him and his genius fiscal advisers allowed him to look like a hero to every infomercial real estate millionaire; Third, the tax-cuts for corporations and wealthy individuals was some kind of weird tribute to the failures of Ronald Reagan – as if he was pissing off Daddy one more time by embracing the “
voodoo economics” his own father dismissed as ineffective.

#19.
The Corpus Christi Killer: This list would not have had so much absurdity and thrill if it weren’t for Dick Cheney. The ultimate moment of pleasure for Bush must have been the day people stopped focusing on his ineptitude and turned the national embarrassment spotlight on Harry Whittington. When Dick Shot Harry is one of those fables of our time that I cannot wait to tell my grandchildren. I’ll leave in all the horror – the Veep “hunting” in a private, guaranteed-kill reserve; the fact he was hunting a bird that would be just as easy to shoot in the wild; the drinking; the cover-up; the drinking; and the fact that the victim is so afraid of Dick that he practically apologized for getting in the way of the birdshot. Birdshot, by the way, being a spray of a bunch of little bullets, so you don’t actually have to aim!
#18.
FOX News: Oh the Hannity Inanity! I know people who actually watch this channel and call it the “news,” despite there being absolutely nothing of substance included. Listen, I know my conservative friends are excited that other stations finally grew a pair to try to bring some journalism and truth into new reporting on cable – so now they can demonize MSNBC and CNN. But, seriously, the FOX Cavalcade of Crazy should embarrass any grown adult. If you want to listen to Bill O for moral advice, or seek out Greta for integrity-filled interviews, or watch Geraldo for his reputation for maturity, or Neil for the latest Joe the Plumber puff piece, or allow Sean to tell you any thing that you might ever care to remember – than you might not be smart enough to call Jeff Foxworthy for your audition.
Also, the FOX friends may claim the real media wanted Obama to be elected, but there still
does not exist any tape of any “journalist” providing this kind of hard interrogation.
#17.
Stupid Comments on the 7’s: Right before his first day in office, Bush introduced us to his compelling argument for overhauling education, which would soon become the No Child Left Behind initiative: “Rarely is the question asked ...is our children learning?”
As the 2004 campaign trudged along, Bush found himself inadvertently continuing to defend the need for education reform in a August stump speech: “You can't read a newspaper if you can't read.”
As W. went to Congress in 2007 to claim the success of the NCLB, he summed up the problems of that 2001 bill in one simple statement: “As yesterday's positive report card shows, childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured.”
No comments:
Post a Comment